logo
Home
>
Market Analysis
>
The Valuation Game: Are Assets Overpriced or Underpriced?

The Valuation Game: Are Assets Overpriced or Underpriced?

02/06/2026
Maryella Faratro
The Valuation Game: Are Assets Overpriced or Underpriced?

In the evolving landscape of private markets, real estate and alternatives, a profound tension has emerged between perception and reality. Some asset classes appear to be trading at record-high entry multiples and deployment pressures, while others lurk beneath the surface, quietly offering attractive discounts relative to intrinsic value. Understanding this complex interplay is essential for investors seeking to navigate the currents of 2026 with confidence and clarity.

Evidence of Overpricing in Private Equity

In 2025, global private equity deal value surged by 19% to reach $2.6 trillion, driven by a remarkable rebound in buyouts valued at $1.8 trillion. At the same time, the median purchase multiple hit record 11.8x EBITDA, eclipsing the 2024 multiple of 11.3x and challenging the previous 2022 peak. Larger transactions, particularly those exceeding $500 million, outpaced smaller deals, highlighting an unrelenting pressure to deploy capital across markets with elevated entry multiples.

North America dominated the landscape, accounting for 57% of global buyout value and experiencing a 29% increase year over year. Megadeals climbed by 74% in the region, while Europe saw a more modest 8% uptick. This disparity widened the North America–Europe valuation gap to 2.0x EBITDA, revealing potential inefficiencies in cross-border pricing.

  • Record multiples: 11.8x median purchase multiple in 2025.
  • Take-privates surged forty-three percent globally, with North America reaching $240 billion.
  • Exits improved by 40%, yet exit value still represented 68% of new buyouts.
  • Holding periods extended to 6.6 years, a new high above the 2011–2020 average of 6.1 years.

Emerging Underpricing Opportunities

Even as private equity multiples tighten, pockets of underpricing beckon. European buyouts traded at significantly lower multiples than their North American peers, suggesting select opportunities in Europe where intrinsic value remains obscured by regional sentiment. Meanwhile, core real estate segments in both North America and Europe are stabilizing, benefiting from lower inflation, falling interest rates and slow but steady improvements in liquidity.

  • Core real estate: Fairly priced with income growth and moderate debt accretion.
  • Infrastructure: Outperformed real estate since 2019, demonstrating stable returns with lower volatility.
  • Real estate debt strategies: Yield advantage from inverted risk-return profiles.

Investors with patient capital now have the chance to deploy dry powder at the most attractive levels since 2020, especially in select mid-market infrastructure projects focused on AI-driven digitization, renewable energy transmission and essential aging upgrades. In particular, real estate debt allocators can secure higher yields with enhanced protection, while infrastructure equity investments benefit from long-term concession contracts and inflation linkage.

Key Drivers Shaping Valuations

Several forces are converging to shape the valuation environment for both over- and underpriced assets. Deployment pressures from record dry powder pools have pushed buyers into increasingly aggressive bids. Simultaneously, a flight to quality in healthcare and technology sectors has driven premiums higher, with healthcare buyouts up 51% and technology deals rising 29% year over year.

Meanwhile, the growing influence of AI across industries is creating divergent outcomes. Companies that can embed intelligent automation and analytics into their operations command higher valuations, while those lagging in adoption risk trading at discounts. These sectoral shifts, coupled with lower financing costs and evolving liquidity conditions, will continue to test the boundaries of rational pricing in 2026.

Furthermore, evolving liquidity conditions and strategic reallocations by large LPs will continue to amplify pricing disparities across market segments.

Risks and Trade-offs to Consider

As valuations diverge, the risks and trade-offs become more pronounced. Reduced reliance on leverage—down to 45% of returns for deals struck between 2010 and 2022—signals a more equity-oriented approach, but this limits potential upside. Volatility in public markets, driven by style crowding and macro uncertainty, can quickly spill over into private valuations.

Outlook for 2026 and Strategic Takeaways

Looking ahead, dealmaking is poised to accelerate as financing terms improve and exit markets mature. However, elevated entry prices demand a renewed focus on operational value creation to justify returns. The firms best positioned for success will combine rigorous due diligence with robust portfolio support capabilities, ensuring that each acquisition can outperform baselines despite lofty multiples.

  • Embrace diversified multi-asset strategies to capture asymmetries across public and private markets.
  • Prioritize sectors with durable tailswinds, including AI infrastructure and renewable energy transmission.
  • Deploy tail-risk hedging and active repositioning to navigate market volatility and protect downside.

By calibrating entry prices with realistic exit scenarios and continuously refining portfolio strategies, investors can navigate both peaks and troughs in asset valuations.

Ultimately, discerning investors who strike the right balance between caution and conviction will uncover both overvalued segments to avoid and underpriced opportunities to seize. By blending quantitative rigor, sector expertise and an unwavering commitment to value creation, market participants can thrive in the dynamic valuation game of 2026.

Maryella Faratro

About the Author: Maryella Faratro

Maryella Faratro is a contributor to progressclear.com, focused on communication, personal development, and balanced progress. Her articles encourage thoughtful action and long-term consistency.